| BD4 Hall of Fame: June 1999 |
[Previous Month][All][List][Recent][Next Month]Date | Player | Position | Level | Score | Comment |
01 June 1999 | | seb | 1 | 41 | 961(37) | A token number one. |
03 June 1999 | | seb | 1 | 60 | 667(30) | Well done. |
04 June 1999 | | seb | 1 | 62, 68 | 996(38), 780(35) | Seeing in the dark elevates seb above asarkila to number 5 ranked player in the world. Also, an 'pre-optimal' score on level 68. |
05 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1 | 4, 7 | 855(31), 852(32) | Another number one. Unfortunately level 7 is optimal even though I recogn my method is better than say Steffests. I need about 3 more ticks for 853. Hmmm, maybe 853 is possible - somehow. |
06 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1 | 68 | 781(35) | I thought 780 was optimal. I might have to play this level as a challenge now. Shit, I have no idea! |
08 June 1999 | | dandalong | 4 | 65 | 1211 | Just 2 points from third in this classic level. |
08 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1 | 55 | 961(68) | I guess I'll have to do it faster! |
09 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1 | 57 | 978(30) | Ditto. |
10 June 1999 | | seb | 1 | 42, 48, 66, 68 | 991(28), 780(31), 729(55), 781(35) | [level 42] Daniel and Pax thought 22/23 time was good, 24 was possible and I thought 25 or perhaps 26.... no one mentioned 28 time! The K Man won't be happy with level 66! |
14 June 1999 | | seb | 1 | 63, 75 | 989(25), 991(24) | Seems seb has his sights set on that number one position. I'm glad a few people have been fighting amongst themselves! |
15 June 1999 | | seb | 2, 1 | 67, 76 | 575(59), 883(36) | Faster, but that's not the point (level 67). |
17 June 1999 | | asarkila | 4 | 80 | 1033(66) | Congratulations to asarkila for becoming the 6th person to complete the game. |
18 June 1999 | | seb | 2, 1 | 26, 50 | 1030(26), 1217(19) | JohnS won't be happy about that. |
20 June 1999 | | seb | 1 | 39, 53 | 1615, 611(19) | DREAM and Wil should be worried. Really worried! |
21 June 1999 | | seb | 2 | 23 | 965 | Massive score. 1000 is the ultimate challenge on this level. It looks like seb will get there quicker than I did. |
21 June 1999 | | DREAM | 3 | 65 | 1365 | DREAM is becoming a big threat on all leve |
23 June 1999 | | DREAM | 3, 1 | 53, 74 | 592(19), 855(40) | Level 53 is interesting thanks to seb. |
24 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1 | 52 | 593(24) | There goes Phil's number one again. |
24 June 1999 | | asarkila | 1 | 70 | 770 | Not bad, but there's still room to improve. |
25 June 1999 | | DREAM | 5, 3, 1, 5, 4, 1, 1 | 49, 54, 58, 60, 63, 68, 75 | 815(44), 1010(12), 703(15), 665(30), 986(25), 781(35), 997(25) | After checking in an ominous ticket (for which the games probably won't be added to the hall of fame) DREAM plays online with clear intentions. |
26 June 1999 | | DREAM | 3, 2 | 51, 56 | 705(32), 865(29) | Even though the BD4 server died because I ran out of 'home' disk quota, the high scores survived to be updated (and to help reconstruct the important logs). So, the server couldn't even stop DREAM for getting that little bit closer. |
27 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1 | - | 48490 | DREAM obtains the number one ranking |
27 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1, 5 | 1, 71 | 1258(15), 771(36) | Doh. I just lost my #1 score logged from Austria. I guess I lost somewhat more than that. |
28 June 1999 | | Wil | 2, 1, 1 | 14, 52, 68 | 908(31), 593(24), 781(35) | Don't worry DREAM, I'm not gonna lay down and die. Mind you, level 68 took a lot of work and I can't get 782 without major rework. On the other hand level 52 was pretty easy :-) |
28 June 1999 | | Phil | 1 | 14 | 913(31) | I was impressed and it helped takes points away from others. |
29 June 1999 | | Phil | 1 | 52 | 594(25) | Well done. My comment earlier in the day (when he equaled the score) was I've seen Phil get 25 time, but lose his keystrokes a few 'ticks' from the end. Come on Phil - your method's kick arse. Having said that, I can't get 25 time. |
29 June 1999 | | asarkila | 3 | 10 | 705(22) | Good stuff. I'll have to refine my method I thinks. |
30 June 1999 | | Wil | 1 | 47 | 1255(19) | Coolies. |
30 June 1999 | | DREAM | 1 | 14 | 913(31) | DREAM takes advantage of the recent findings. |
|